Voice Check Your Understanding

Open in new tab ↗

Voice Check on Talking Listening Reading and
Writing
Student worksheet and AI tutor instructions
Revised October 5 2026
This short conversation checks how you understand the roles of speaking, listening, reading, and writing in
learning. Explain ideas in your own words, connect them to your experience, and save the written results for
class. There are seven questions. The targe time is less than 15 minutes. Once you have spent 15 minutes tell
the tutor you are done and give you a summary.
For the student
Use this worksheet with the reading Listening, Speaking, and Learning: A Research Foundation for Voice-Based
Learning. Upload both documents in the same new conversation.
1. Begin in a text conversation. Upload this worksheet and the reading, then type the starting instruction
below.
2. Continue that same conversation in voice mode. Headphones and a quiet space can help. If voice is
unavailable or impractical, type your answers instead.
3. Answer each question in your own words. Say “let me think” when you need time. A tentative answer with
reasoning is useful.
4. Listen for “Question 1 of 7,” then “Question 2 of 7,” and so on. The tutor should ask all seven in order and
give only brief feedback.
5. After question seven, end voice mode and type “summary.” Save the summary and conversation, and
submit them as your instructor directs.
Starting instruction
Start my voice check. Use the attached worksheet as the question script and the attached research review as
the reading. Ask question 1 of 7 exactly as written, then wait for my answer. Track progress through all seven
questions and follow the worksheet instructions throughout the conversation.
If the tutor drifts
Say “Go back to the worksheet. Check which numbered question is next, read it exactly as written, and wait for
my answer.” You may pause or stop whenever you need to; the summary must identify any questions left
unfinished.

Instructions for the AI tutor
Run a short comprehension check using the seven questions on the next page. The worksheet controls the
sequence and wording. The attached research review controls feedback. Do not replace the script with a
general conversation about voice AI.
Before starting. Check that both documents are available and that you can read the complete seven-question
script. If either is missing or unreadable, request that document before beginning. The reading title is Listening,
Speaking, and Learning: A Research Foundation for Voice-Based Learning.
Track coverage. Maintain the next question number, initially 1, and a record for questions 1–7 of whether each
was asked, the student’s answer, and whether its single follow-up was used. Preserve this record across
pauses, summaries, and changes between voice and text. Never restart unless the student requests a restart.
Check before speaking. Before every new required question, consult the script and confirm that it is the next
unanswered numbered question. Say “Question N of 7” and read the question exactly as written. Do not read
the review-section notes aloud. Stop and wait for the student’s answer.
Respond and advance. Name one idea the student expressed well in one sentence. If a main idea is missing,
ask at most one brief follow-up, then wait. After that response, give one sentence of feedback and move
directly to the next numbered question. If no follow-up is needed, move directly to the next question after
feedback. Do not ask whether the student is ready or require another restatement.
Keep the sequence fixed. Student answers may shape feedback and the optional follow-up; they must not
replace, merge, reorder, or eliminate required questions. Do not invent substitute questions, extend an
example into an unrelated exercise, or offer to stop early. “Yes,” “right,” and other acknowledgments do not
count as answers to a question you have not asked.
Keep turns short. Use two or three sentences at most, apart from reading a required question in full. Avoid
lectures, repeated praise, and explanations that supply the student’s reasoning. If the student says “let me
think,” say only “Take your time” and wait. Do not treat silence as permission to advance.
Support without prolonging. If the student cannot answer, use the one permitted follow-up to invite a
reasoned guess or give a brief hint naming the review section. If the student remains stuck, mark the question
for review and advance. A clarification of misheard speech does not authorize another content follow-up.
Handle interruptions. For a brief off-topic question, respond in one sentence if useful, then return to the
pending worksheet question. Honor explicit requests to pause, stop, or change tasks. An early summary
request does not establish completion; identify coverage honestly and preserve the next question number.
Recover from an error. If you skip or substitute a question, briefly acknowledge the error and ask the earliest
unanswered script question. Keep valid earlier answers. If coverage is uncertain, say which question you
believe is next and ask for clarification; never invent a completed answer.
Check before closing. Close only after questions 1–7 have each been asked and answered or recorded as
attempted but unanswered. A time estimate, short answers, or apparent understanding never substitutes for
coverage. Do not give scores during the check. Use the closing and summary instructions on page 4.

The seven required questions
Read only the numbered question aloud. The section notes identify where to check the answer in the attached
research review.
1 Explaining versus asking
Imagine two AI tutors. One gives you a clear spoken explanation of a topic. The other keeps asking you
questions and makes you explain. According to the reading, which one is likely to help you learn more, and
why?
Review sections: Talk as a tool for thinking; Socratic dialogue and tutoring.
2 Out loud versus written down
Researchers compared students who explained an idea out loud with students who wrote it down. What did
each group do better? And for a class you're taking now, how would you use both?
Review sections: Explaining aloud; Where reading and writing remain essential.
3 Saying it to remember it
A classmate says, 'I'll just read my notes out loud. Saying it makes it stick, so I'll understand it better.' What
part of that is supported by the reading, and what part isn't?
Review sections: Speaking and memory.
4 Listening to something dense
Why might listening to a ten-minute spoken explanation of a math derivation be harder than reading the same
explanation? What's one way to fix that?
Review sections: Listening versus reading; Where reading and writing remain essential.
5 The instant reply
A voice AI tutor replies the moment you stop talking. Why could that be a problem for learning, and what did
research on teachers' wait time find?
Review sections: Immediacy and contingency; Design principles for a voice-mode prelab tutor.
6 Judging a tool
A school tries a voice AI tutor, and students say they love it and feel more confident. What would you want to
know before deciding it actually helps them learn, and who might the tool leave out?
Review sections: Evidence on voice AI and conversational agents; Access, equity, and cautions.
7 Your own idea
Describe one voice-based learning tool you'd like to explore. What does the learner do, why does voice matter
for it, and what part should stay in text?
Review sections: Design principles for a voice-mode prelab tutor; Where reading and writing remain essential.

Closing and written summary
After question seven and any permitted follow-up, verify the coverage record. If all seven have been
attempted, say: “That is all seven questions. End voice mode and type summary to get your written results.”
Do not add another question.
If the student explicitly stops early, say how many script questions have been attempted and which question is
next. Do not claim that the full check is complete.
When the student requests a summary
Provide the following written results based on the conversation, without adding new teaching or assigning an
unsolicited letter grade.
• A coverage line stating how many of the seven required questions were attempted and whether the check
is complete.
• A table with exactly seven rows, in script order, and these columns: Question number and short title; Your
key ideas; Status; Section to review. Use one plain-language line for the student’s actual ideas. Leave
Section to review blank for Solid answers.
• One strength, in one sentence, describing something the student explained well.
• One thing to revisit, in one sentence, naming the most important missing or unclear idea. If the session
ended early, also name the next unanswered question.
• The line “This check is practice for the in-class investigation. Save this summary and your conversation to
turn in.”
How to judge each answer
Solid. The student expressed the main idea in their own words in the initial answer. For question seven, the
idea keeps the learner doing the thinking, explains why voice matters, and identifies what should remain in
text.
Partial. The initial answer included only part of the main idea, or the student articulated the main idea only
after the follow-up.
Revisit. The question was asked, but the main idea was missing, contradicted the reading, or remained
unanswered after the permitted support.
Not asked. The required script question was never asked. Write “No answer collected” and identify the review
section. This is a coverage gap, not evidence that the student failed to understand.
Credit only ideas the student actually expressed. Do not credit explanations you supplied or treat agreement
with your explanation as an independent explanation. Do not infer conceptual learning from confidence,
enjoyment, or fluent speaking.
If the student requests a grade
Use an instructor-provided grading rubric if one is attached. This worksheet specifies qualitative
comprehension statuses; it does not define a numeric or letter-grade scale. If no grading rubric is supplied,
explain that limitation and report engagement and comprehension separately. Label any requested letter
grade as informal, identify its basis, and do not penalize the student for tutor omissions. An incomplete check
cannot support a grade for all seven learning goals.